🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency caused by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for achieving ceasefire appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its retaliation: a renewed assault of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Negotiation and Warfare

The chain of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, political struggles are fought: optimistic declarations are delivered from various governments. Significant resources is devoted on restraining specific proposals. By night, Moscow brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the key method for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As Russia's attack developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from Russian territory, a capability afforded by timely intelligence. From observation points, military aircraft that had been deployed to intercept incoming aerial threats flew past – modern combat jets delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: multiple launches targeted at a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably supplied through Western nations. Every deployment creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The instant of fear quickly transforms into sober acceptance: perhaps the approaching threat won't hit its mark this time, preventing destruction from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Following this, a large-caliber weapon opened up on a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a rapid response unit – probably Western-made equipment. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it pressed on overhead toward its destination.

Intermittently, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: seven people killed, devastation and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the night's assault. As typically, everyone still went about their day – enduring hostilities. But those entire period illustrated Ukraine's vital need on external assistance – a dependence that neighboring countries are clearly incapable to replace in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from US administration provoked deep reactions, controversy and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new proposal from US leadership adheres to the same pattern: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually achieve victory. This cycle will, undoubtedly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is tempting to accuse specific actors of repeatedly advocating Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington works based on a premise familiar among seasoned negotiators: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have been unable to protect through force. The US administration assumes that it is unfeasible to force Russia to abandon the land that it presently holds in Ukraine's south or east.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, US leadership does nothing to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from assuming that the current condition will not shift further in its benefit in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Moscow is confident that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their motivation to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is close to zero. There may be many attempts to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's leader remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, progressively conceding people and territory but averting a entire defensive failure until situations evolve in its benefit.

Current Realities

Factually, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, subjective factors are becoming relevant: political desires to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the national cause against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their focus does not move to homefront challenges. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after current events, it remains highly unlikely that this will modify their basic position.

These conflicting dynamics are influencing discussions.

Assessment and Future

It took a just a single week to eliminate the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, resistance by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new initiatives based on old ideas are imminent, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and reflect certain reluctance to change the course of events, if they remain united and strengthen their defence capabilities at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to defend against evening bombardments will, for the predictable period, largely rely on sustained allied backing.