🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation and Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.