🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by mediators to resume talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president asserting the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations reopen.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the forum, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the assaults started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had always sought to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and continues the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the same tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more united, and more backing of the government and the state in the face of this invasion."